dccc.org - 3 SBLs

Discussion in 'Mail Chat' started by roundabout, Aug 16, 2012.

  1. roundabout

    roundabout VIP

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    154
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has some explaining to do!

    Ref: SBL151610
    69.25.202.75/32 is listed on the Spamhaus Block List (SBL)
    2012-08-16 19:26:37 GMT | SR31 | bluestatedigital.com
    dccc.org (Third SBL!)

    Hitting spamtraps. Again. :(

    Received: from mta-inap9.bluestatedigital.com (mta-inap9.bluestatedigital.com [69.25.202.75])
    Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 <x>
    From: Angela Guzman <[email protected]>
    Reply-to: [email protected]
    Subject: <x> and Barack

    URI: http://dccc.org/<x>

    Paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
    430 South Capitol Street, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003
    (202) 863-1500 http://www.dccc.org

    Blue State Digital INAP-BSN-BLUESTATE-1938 (NET-69-25-202-64-1) 69.25.202.64 - 69.25.202.127
    Internap Network Services Corporation PNAP-12-2002 (NET-69-25-0-0-1) 69.25.0.0 - 69.25.255.255

    Domain ID:D323505-LROR
    Domain Name:DCCC.ORG
    Created On:25-Aug-1994 04:00:00 UTC
    Last Updated On:29-May-2012 14:06:31 UTC
    Expiration Date:24-Aug-2014 04:00:00 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:Network Solutions, LLC (R63-LROR)
    Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
    Registrant ID:21849141-NSI
    Registrant Name:DemocraticCongressionalCampaign Committee
    Registrant Organization:DemocraticCongressionalCampaign Committee
    Registrant Street1:430 South Capitol St, SE
    Registrant Street2:2nd Floor
    Registrant Street3:
    Registrant City:Washington
    Registrant State/Province:DC
    Registrant Postal Code:20003
    Registrant Country:US
    Registrant Phone:+1.2028631500
    Registrant Phone Ext.:
    Registrant FAX:
    Registrant FAX Ext.:
    Registrant Email:[email protected]
    Admin ID:34147674-NSI
    Admin Name:DCCC MIS
    Admin Organization:DCCC
    Admin Street1:430 S. Capitol St. SE
    Admin Street2:2nd Floor
    Admin Street3:
    Admin City:Washington
    Admin State/Province:DC
    Admin Postal Code:20003
    Admin Country:US
    Admin Phone:+1.202863150
    Admin Phone Ext.:
    Admin FAX:
    Admin FAX Ext.:
    Admin Email:[email protected]
    Tech ID:34147674-NSI
    Tech Name:DCCC MIS
    Tech Organization:DCCC
    Tech Street1:430 S. Capitol St. SE
    Tech Street2:2nd Floor
    Tech Street3:
    Tech City:Washington
    Tech State/Province:DC
    Tech Postal Code:20003
    Tech Country:US
    Tech Phone:+1.202863150
    Tech Phone Ext.:
    Tech FAX:
    Tech FAX Ext.:
    Tech Email:[email protected]
    Name Server:NS1.TWTELECOM.NET
    Name Server:NS2.TWTELECOM.NET
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    Name Server:
    DNSSEC:Unsigned
     
  2. DaMadHatter

    DaMadHatter Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    In the Void
    You would be surprised at how many legitimate businesses end up on the weekly SBL reports.

    There is a solid business model opportunity there. By that I mean, plenty of big businesses interested in mailing, and the power of that medium. But they obviously have no clue how to effectively market, most are not CAN-SPAM compliant, or have decent targeted lists.

    It is amusing to see congressmen, and their campaigns getting SBL's during election season.

    :driver:
     
  3. DKPMO

    DKPMO VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,452
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Elaborate Underground Base
    Democrats are SPAMMERS !!!
     
  4. erbux

    erbux VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    266
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    eastern empire
    They've been getting SBLs for the better part of the past decade.
    And you know what? They don't give a f*** and it doesn't slow them down.
     
  5. sjinks

    sjinks VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Sevastopol, Ukraine
    Home Page:
    Looks like they have already fixed that.

     
  6. getstarted

    getstarted VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    58
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Thats because spamhaus is scared of them. They know if they pull there shit on them, and piss off the right person, spamhaus will be gone
     
  7. sjinks

    sjinks VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    301
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Sevastopol, Ukraine
    Home Page:
    I thought Spamhaus was UK-based, not US-based, no?
     
  8. DKPMO

    DKPMO VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,452
    Likes Received:
    68
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Elaborate Underground Base
    Spamhaus does not give a shit about US law as they stated many times over. They openly scoff at any attempts to bring them to justice in any US jurisdiction.

    Taking down Spamhaus would require the same level of commitment as fighting Al Qaeda. Translation - not gonna happen.
     
  9. jellyfish

    jellyfish VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would say its quite different than fighting Al Qaeda... A well placed call by the right sitting congressmen, or that one democrat that is always promising change, could make the UK reign fury upon SH.

    Which is why the SBL's will probably never last longer than a few hours...
     
  10. DaMadHatter

    DaMadHatter Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    51
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    In the Void
    I doubt that would happen unless it really started interfering with their long term election campaign.

    I'd hazard a guess, most of Congress has minimal knowledge of the Haus, and their effect on internet commerce. If you managed to lite a fire under some of the commerce, and business lobbying groups, you might get some results in that regard. Keep in mind however, that not all mailers are created equal. There are some major baddies out there.

    That being said, any number of ISP's have said over the years that they would fight Haus, but are not going to do it for free. A number of ISP's, and their network admins, believe in U.S. commerce laws, and CAN-SPAM compliance. However, their network admins openly admit while they see some of the mail as CAN-SPAM compliant, they simply to not have the time and energy to fight back and forth with Haus, and just give in ultimately as it's faster.

    Same as happened with Burst, Sharktech, or any number of others who had to throw their clients to the wolves. At some point, they simply have to pick the path of least resistance as they have a business to run, and these "escalation" SBL's start effecting clean clients. However, those sorts of things are pissing off a lot of companies. It's only a matter of time before one of them actually MAKES THE TIME to fight them. You can't cite U.S. laws, and regulations all of the time, while claiming to be international and untouchable.
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2012

Share This Page